Chinese automakers have a math problem at home, and the United States looks like the answer. A fight-to-the-death price war is bleeding the industry dry, with red ink everywhere and profit margins squeezed to nothing. Access to the American market — the most lucrative in the world — would be, in the words of former General Motors executive Michael Dunne, "like a giant tank of life-saving oxygen."
Chery, one of China's largest exporters, has now said out loud what others only whisper: it wants in, and it is willing to partner with Detroit to get there.
The problem for Chery is that the door is bolted shut. The U.S. places a 100-percent tariff on imported Chinese vehicles and bans Chinese vehicle software outright. So Chery's pitch is less a business proposal than a legal workaround — and Detroit, so far, has shown little appetite for playing host.
Chery Vice President Charlie Zhang told Reuters the company is "very open to different options, even a potential partnership with American automakers." He went further, insisting Chery could engineer its way around the rules entirely: "Definitely from a technical point of view, we will be able to find a China-free solution in terms of hardware and software." The goal, as Zhang framed it, is a car that leans on neither Chinese hardware nor Chinese code.
In practice, a deal like this could mean Ford or GM building cars for Chery on American soil, giving the Chinese brand a foothold while technically staying compliant with import tariffs and software bans. Chery is not short on resources to make it happen. The company generates significant sales and profits across Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and Southeast Asia, and is one of China's top car exporters. It sells under its own name as well as the export-focused Omoda and Jaecoo badges.
Those badges have already made noise. The Jaecoo 7 topped the U.K. sales chart — the first Chinese car ever to do so — though the British press mocked it as a "Temu Range Rover" for its resemblance to the Range Rover Velar.
The chief obstacle is the Connected Vehicle Rule. Beginning with the 2027 model year, it blocks sales and imports of connected vehicles and software with ties to China and Russia. The rule is enforced by the Bureau of Industry and Security, the arm of the U.S. Department of Commerce that handles export and security controls, and it already has a body count: the software ban pushed Geely-owned Polestar out of the U.S. market.
Simply gaming the system is harder than it sounds. Sun Kuo-hsiang, who teaches international relations and commerce at Taiwan's Nanhua University, warned that switching brands, lining up U.S. distributors, or shipping exports in through Mexico or Canada "will not automatically bypass the restrictions."
Deals involving acquisitions, certain investments, or real estate can also draw scrutiny from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. Whether any partnership materializes, Sun argued, depends on whether the American side is willing to shoulder the commercial and political risk and whether the arrangement can clear regulatory review.
There is precisely one working template, and it belongs to Volvo. The Swedish brand, acquired by China's Geely, is the only Chinese-owned automaker to secure a written exemption from the Department of Commerce on connected vehicle technology. U.S.-based China analyst Wang He noted that despite Geely's ownership, Volvo has kept independent brand operations, and that the Geely-derived technical architecture in its U.S.-imported cars makes up only a very small share of the vehicle.
Nearly every car Volvo imports into the United States is built in Europe or the U.S. itself, and the company made critical commitments on corporate governance, technical architecture, and data security that ensured a clean separation. Wang calls this the "Volvo model" — acquire an overseas brand, keep it at arm's length, and sell its products into America. It is a narrow path, and Volvo is the only one who has walked it.
The resistance is unusually unified. Wang noted that six major U.S. automotive industry groups jointly wrote the federal government to demand it keep blocking Chinese automakers, whether through imports or domestic production. Separately, as CNBC reported, a consortium of trade groups representing manufacturers, dealers, and suppliers urged a rethink of any softening. The United Auto Workers is unlikely to roll out the welcome mat.
Washington is lined up alongside them. More than two dozen Democratic lawmakers sent a letter urging that restrictions stay in place, and bipartisan bills to ban Chinese automakers are moving through Congress. Sen. Elissa Slotkin framed it as a question not of party but of whether the country wants to keep making cars at home and keep a manufacturing base that can pivot when needed — and if it does, she argued, it should not let Chinese automakers in.
The industry's objection is competitive, and it is blunt. Nissan Americas chairman Christian Meunier told CNBC that Chinese rivals make decent product but are dumping it, and that the real contest is against their governments rather than their automakers. Dunne's forecast is grimmer still: Chinese automakers, he said, would "quickly overwhelm America's auto industry, just as it is now ravaging Europe." That claim is not hypothetical — Chinese brands' European market share went from virtually nothing in 2020 to 12%, enough that roughly one in every 10 cars sold in Europe now wears a Chinese badge.
For all the opposition, the industry's own leaders concede this is a matter of when, not if. Ford CEO Jim Farley has openly said U.S. automakers cannot assume Chinese brands will be shut out forever, and he told an industry conference to expect the U.S. border breached within five to 10 years. Meunier, despite his dumping complaint, said the same: "We need to get ready for the day when they come to the U.S. because it will happen one day. Hopefully not tomorrow, but it will happen one day."
The administration has at times left the door ajar. President Trump said he might be "OK" with Chinese automakers if they built vehicles domestically, echoing earlier comments that he'd welcome Chinese plants if they meant American jobs.
Chery, meanwhile, is working the edges. The company already sells in Mexico and is aiming for a Canadian debut in early 2027. Wang reads the sequence clearly: once Chery is established in Canada — where emissions and safety rules are essentially identical to America's — the next logical step is the United States.
The near-term question is whether any American automaker breaks ranks. Stellantis offers a cautionary note: it took a 21% stake in Leapmotor within a venture it majority-controls, but then shelved a plan to build Leapmotor vehicles at its idled Brampton, Ontario, plant. Working with the Chinese threat rather than against it has proven easier to announce than to execute.
Watch the Connected Vehicle Rule's 2027 enforcement date, the progress of the bipartisan ban bills, and whether Chery's promised "China-free solution" can actually clear Commerce the way Volvo's did. The appetite is there on one side of the table. Whether anyone in Detroit sits down at the other is the real story.
[Images: Chery, WhiteHouse.gov, Ford]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.